Science and Truth

 

Basic Questions:

·         What is truth?

·         What is science?

·         What are facts?

·         Is scientific language different? How?

·         How do we know anything?

·         Is "truth" the same thing as "certain Knowledge"?

·         Is the universe open or closed?

·         Intrinsic and extrinsic properties. Is Weight or number the same Kind of thing as  smell or color? 

 

Ways of Knowing or answering questions:

·         Frodo's question: "what do I have in my pocket?"

·         What sex am I?

·         When was I born?  Where was I born?

·         What is my favorite song? Why did I choose my career?

 

Implications/burning questions: 

·         Age of the universe.

·         Origins issues.

·         Reality of the supernatural world.

·         Miracles.

·         Reliability of scripture.

·         How should we then live?

 

Basic concepts:

·         All truth is God's truth,

·         Truth cannot conflict with itself. Partially understood truth can appear to conflict with other partially understood truth.

·         Science is properly a methodology and not a body of knowledge.

·         There are different types of questions, which require differing methodologies to answer.

·         If a particular question is not answerable using one particular method, it does not follow that the question has no answer.

·         Incorrect choice of method may lead to incorrect answers, or no answer.

·         Every method is based upon assumptions, and ultimately all assumptions can be queried and driven back to axioms, fundamental assumptions about the deep nature of the cosmos. 

·         Scientific theories are not abandoned by scientists just because they have some unsolvable problems, but only because, and when, a better theory comes along.

·         There is no better naturalistic theory of biological origins than modern Darwinism, hence its tenacity.

·         Modern science answers many questions marvelously well (What, where, when and how), but begs most of the deepest questions: (who and why).

·         These questions of person and intention and meaning require a different method: personal communication and revelation.

·         Science and revelation are not opposed; simply different methods of Knowing, and dealing generally with different questions. Neither reveals all there is to know.

 

Books of interest:

 

Johnson, Philip, Reason in the Balance as well as his other works.

Denton, Michael, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis

Pearcy, Nancy and Thaxton, Charles, The Soul of Science: Christian Faith and Natural Philosophy

Clark, Gordon H, The Philosophy of Science and Belief in God

 

Return to Mars Hill                   Respond to Author by e-mail